tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-209567492024-02-19T11:47:09.963-05:00Another AngleWorking Every Day to Make Republicans Irrelevant.Gregory Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02174480604474920143noreply@blogger.comBlogger192125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20956749.post-41674025366662293402009-02-19T10:33:00.004-05:002009-02-19T12:58:44.514-05:00Obama With A WhipTime to start leading with a whip and a clenched fist.<br /><br />I am so sick of reading about why The Obama Administration is <a href="http://firedoglake.com/2009/02/19/sibelius-wants-hhs-but-white-house-fears-anti-abortion-backlash-from-phill-kline-groupies/">afraid</a> of this and how the don't want to upset that. They lost and it's time to pay the butcher's bill.<br /><br />If McCain had won and the republicans had the numbers we have, don't you think...wait, we know how the would lead. And it's not about getting even.<br /><br />If what we think is true about the <a href="http://businessmirror.com.ph/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=6384:fed-sees-no-quick-economic-rebound&catid=51:world&Itemid=67">economy</a>, if what we know is true about <a href="http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Biden_US_has_never_been_weaker_0523.html">our position in the world</a>, if what we know is true about the condition of our education system, and on and on, we don't have the luxury of massaging hurt egos of the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhglL8_EnSc">Republicans</a>. Think about it, they have Governors who are actually posturing about the stimulus money. They, politically, don't have a clue. They never have cared about the state of the American people, and now in their frenzy to get power back, they show everyone just who they really are.<br /><br />Booby Jindal Governor of Louisiana, one of the top states as far as poverty is concerned<span class="transl_class" title="Click to correct" id="0"></span>, I believe, and where folk are still trying to recover from Katrina, <span style="font-weight: bold;">ACTUALLY</span> said he might refuse the stimulus money. Keep giving us campaign commercials <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/02/17/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry4807323.shtml">Booby</a>.<br /><br />This administration needs to follow their gut and do whats right for all of us. Ignore ignorance. Ignore backward thinking. Ignore the Republican party. Hitch them up to your wagon and run them until they bleed from every orifice.Gregory Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02174480604474920143noreply@blogger.com8tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20956749.post-6877798408045802312009-02-17T13:43:00.002-05:002009-02-17T14:25:13.058-05:00I'm BackSomeone once said, take a break. Clear your head. Maybe go on a vacation.<br /><br />Well, I took a break. In the midst of clearing my head so I could plan a vacation, I ran face first into an election. But not just any election, the biggest, most anticipated one since I've been around.<br /><br />And unless you've been on another planet, you know which one I speak of. While doing my little part, I met a lot of tremendous people. Young and old. Of all colors and creeds. And with the anger and enthusiasm like I haven't seen since an April day in 1968 right before all hell broke loose in Avondale(little hometown reference).<br /><br />We have done something that many of us never thought they would see. But now that it's done, now that all the swearing in, parades, and dancing is done reality is sinking in.<br /><br />The rethuglicans are who they always were, only wounded and desperate. So desperate their mouthpiece says he wants to see President Obama fail. Now as much as I knew Bush to be a poser and benefactor of theft, I never wanted him to fail. Knew he would but didn't want it. You see, now we know what the phrase "failure is not an option" means. This is where we end up having a failure for president.<br /><br />So over the last few weeks we have seen rethugs try their darndest toturn an already too small Stimulus into a relic of their past. Laden with tax cuts for wealthy. Well in a move, the likes of which we are just beginning to see, Obama and the Democratic Senators gave them what Obama had already promised to do. And they have nerve to trumpet their victory<br /><br />Well now is the time to gear up for the next battle. The battle to rid our counrty of these relics of the past. Time to send them packing, never to return. For in the last few weeks they have shown themselves to not have the best interest of the people. So in my opinion, it's time for them to disappear.<br /><br />Electing Obama was step one. The next step is making rethugs a footnote in history. And I say the sooner the better.Gregory Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02174480604474920143noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20956749.post-37736228112251526602008-08-03T15:07:00.002-04:002008-08-03T15:10:10.671-04:00It' My Birthday...<span style="font-family: arial;">Here's The King, Stevie Wonder on his birthday</span>.<br /><br /><br /><br /><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/FDpITVZKBAU&hl=en&fs=1"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/FDpITVZKBAU&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>Gregory Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02174480604474920143noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20956749.post-33211142315582261102008-07-31T22:24:00.002-04:002008-07-31T22:41:26.637-04:00They're Out There...And They're Weird!!!<span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0); font-weight: bold;font-family:arial;" >From The Randi Rhodes Radio Program on 7/30/2008. I was listening and laughing my ass off!</span><br /><br /><span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0); font-weight: bold;font-family:arial;" >The only problem is he's not alone with that line of thinking. Truly tired!</span><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/UVaTJG_w9O8&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/UVaTJG_w9O8&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>Gregory Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02174480604474920143noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20956749.post-81470197234772006952008-07-30T22:49:00.003-04:002008-07-30T22:53:45.008-04:00Is This Why So Many Are Denied Their Disability Claims<span style="font-family: arial;font-size:130%;" ><a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/richard-viguerie-bush-white-house/story.aspx?guid=%7B90C78AE3-37F3-4C51-A513-CE13044FB171%7D&dist=hppr" target="_blank">Richard Viguerie: Bush White House Hides True Scope of Federal Deficit</a><br /></span><div style="font-family: arial;" class="p"> MANASSAS, Va., July 29, 2008 /PRNewswire-USNewswire via COMTEX/ --<br /><br />The following is a statement by Richard A. Viguerie, Chairman of ConservativeHQ.com, regarding the White House projection of a $482 billion deficit for Fiscal Year 2009: </div> <div style="font-family: arial;" class="p"> "The White House has issued figures indicating that President Bush and his enablers in Congress will leave his successor with a budget deficit of $482 Billion for Fiscal Year 2009, which is a record.<br /><br />How's that for a legacy?<br /><br /></div> <div style="font-family: arial;" class="p"> "As shocking as this deficit figure is, that's still not the true scope of our budget woes because it excludes $80 billion in war costs and <span style="font-weight: bold;">$227 billion borrowed from the Social Security Trust Fund.</span> </div> <div style="font-family: arial;" class="p"> <br />"The real budget deficit is therefore $789 billion.<br /><br /> </div> <div style="font-family: arial;" class="p"> "Under accounting trickery that would probably land the top officers of a publicly traded company in jail, the money borrowed from the Social Security Trust Fund -- and spent on anything and everything except Social Security payments -- is not counted towards the budget deficit, although it is part of our $9.49 Trillion National Debt.<br /><br /></div> <div style="font-family: arial;" class="p"> "It's way past time for Washington politicians to have their own Sarbanes-Oxley. </div> <div style="font-family: arial;" class="p"> "But this is how corrupt Washington has become. Besides the dangerous practice of massive deficit spending, which will saddle our children and grandchildren with trillions of dollars of debt, the Bush White House and Congress are conspiring to conceal the true nature and scope of the problem.<br /><br /></div> <div style="font-family: arial;" class="p"> "This year's budget deficit will actually be $307 billion worse than the politicians are saying. This fraud on the American people is a conspiracy of silence by both major political parties. </div> <div style="font-family: arial;" class="p"> "In stunning hypocrisy, the White House blamed the record budget deficit on the slowing economy and the $150 billion stimulus package passed earlier this year.<br /><br /></div> <div style="font-family: arial;" class="p"> "No, Mr. President, the buck stops with you. Stand up and accept the responsibility -- and your legacy -- for massively expanding government." </div><br /> <div class="excerpt"><br /></div>Gregory Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02174480604474920143noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20956749.post-18722327882481458022008-07-30T17:44:00.001-04:002008-07-30T17:48:04.088-04:00Taser-Related Death<h1 style="font-family: arial;">Statesville suspect dies
<br />after Taser hits in jail</h1> <h2 style="font-family: arial;">At least two officers are put on administrative duty until SBI can complete its investigation.</h2><h3 style="font-family: arial;">By Victoria Cherrie</h3><h3 style="font-family: arial;" class="creditline"><a href="mailto:vcherrie@charlotteobserver.com">vcherrie@charlotteobserver.com</a></h3> <!-- START /pubsys/production/story/story_assets.comp --> <div style="font-family: arial;" id="storyAssets"> <script language="Javascript"> function PopupPic(sPicURL, sHeight, sWidth) { window.open( "http://media.charlotteobserver.com/static/popup.html?"+sPicURL, "", "resizable=1,HEIGHT=" +sHeight+ ",WIDTH=" +sWidth); } </script> <!-- photo or image available --><div id="mainImage"> <!-- Start: /pubsys/production/story/assets/image_embedded.comp --> <div class="image"> <a href="http://www.charlotte.com/local/story/732918-a733196-t2.html" onclick="'window.open(" menubar="no,width="620,height="550,toolbar="no"><img src="http://media.charlotteobserver.com/smedia/2008/07/29/06/305-davidson150.embedded.prod_affiliate.57.jpg" alt="Anthony Davidson" /></a> <h2>Anthony Davidson</h2> </div> <!-- End: /pubsys/production/story/assets/image_embedded.comp --> </div> <!-- no polls to display --> </div> <!-- END /pubsys/production/story/story_assets.comp --> <p style="font-family: arial;"> A Statesville man died after being shocked multiple times by Tasers at the Iredell County jail over the weekend, sources say.</p><p style="font-family: arial;">Anthony Davidson, 29, was unresponsive when he was taken to Iredell Memorial Hospital Saturday afternoon. He was put on life support and died late Sunday night, police said.</p><p style="font-family: arial;">His death is the second Taser-related death this year in the Charlotte area. In March, 17-year-old Darryl Wayne Turner, died after Charlotte-Mecklenburg police used a Taser on him at a Food Lion store in Charlotte. </p><p style="font-family: arial;">The officers involved in Davidson's arrest – at least two from the Statesville Police Department – were put on administrative duty until the State Bureau of Investigation completes a probe into the incident.</p><p style="font-family: arial;">Assistant Chief Tom Anderson of the Statesville Police Department said he was unaware how many officers or deputies may have fired their Tasers and the duration of the shocks. </p><p style="font-family: arial;">But a source familiar with the investigation told the Observer that Davidson was shocked at least three times by several different law enforcement officers. Family members told the Observer that police said he had been shocked at least twice. </p><p style="font-family: arial;">The incident began about 3 p.m. Saturday at a Statesville grocery store. Employees at the Food Lion on N.C. 115 told police they tried unsuccessfully to stop Davidson from leaving the store with a full cart of groceries after his debit card was declined. He left the parking lot without the groceries, police said. </p><p style="font-family: arial;">When officers caught up with Davidson a short time later, he was carrying an Applebee's gift card from the store that hadn't been paid for, Anderson said.</p><p style="font-family: arial;">Officers took Davidson to the Iredell County Jail where he appeared before a magistrate on a larceny charge. Davidson was behaving abnormally from the time officers first encountered him, Anderson said.</p><p style="font-family: arial;">While being booked, Davidson became “physically aggressive and was communicating loudly,” Anderson said. That's when officers used one or more Tasers to get him “back under control,” police said.</p><p style="font-family: arial;">A nurse who screened Davidson afterward told officers he needed further medical screening because he appeared to be “under the influence of some type of impairing substance.”</p><p style="font-family: arial;">Paramedics took Davidson to the hospital Saturday. His condition continued to decline and he was unresponsive when he arrived, Anderson said. He was admitted to intensive care and was taken off life support about 10:30 p.m. Sunday.</p><p style="font-family: arial;">Statesville police and the sheriff's office are reviewing the incident internally to determine whether the arresting officers followed procedures. The sheriff's office did not return phone calls Monday.</p><p style="font-family: arial;">Davidson, who was unemployed, had been in jail previously – mostly on charges such as possessing marijuana, simple assault and misdemeanor larceny, all of which were dropped by a district attorney, according to court documents. In 1999 and again in 2000, he was found guilty of violating a domestic violence protective order. In 2006, he pleaded guilty to driving while impaired, documents show.</p><p style="font-family: arial;">Davidson's family said they weren't aware of him using or having a problem with drugs or alcohol. </p><p style="font-family: arial;">“He was a very happy, joyful person – the life of the party type of person who lit up a room when he walked in,” said his uncle, Jerry Moore. “Whether he used or had used substances, we don't know.”</p><p style="font-family: arial;">They said police told them Davidson fell while being subdued and may have hit his head.</p><p style="font-family: arial;">An autopsy is scheduled later this week, Moore said.</p><p style="font-family: arial;">Last month, the officer involved in the Charlotte Taser incident was cleared of criminal charges but was suspended for five days for violating the department's policy when he continuously shocked Darryl Turner for 37 seconds, a factor that contributed to his death.</p><p style="font-family: arial;">A Taser is a weapon that typically uses compressed nitrogen to shoot two tethered needle-like probes that penetrate skin and deliver an electric shock. It's designed to temporarily subdue a person. Studies suggest that multiple shocks might increase the risk of serious injury, which has prompted some agencies to limit the number of times an officer can shock someone.</p><p style="font-family: arial;">Officers are taught to pull and immediately release the Taser trigger to deliver a five-second shock. They may repeatedly pull the trigger in extreme circumstances when necessary to control a suspect. But the goal is to use the minimal force necessary to control a suspect, Anderson said.</p><p style="font-family: arial;">Taser-related deaths across North Carolina prompted a coalition to study Taser use. The N.C. Taser Safety Project surveyed the state's 100 sheriff's offices and found that 70 issued Tasers to some or all of its deputies, but many agencies lack clear policies about when and how they should be used.</p>Gregory Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02174480604474920143noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20956749.post-31776861688974621642008-07-30T17:43:00.001-04:002008-07-30T17:43:57.113-04:00New York's Finest<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=8,0,0,0" id="vxFlashPlayer7155" width="416" height="410" ><param name="movie" value="http://publish.vx.roo.com/nypost/viral/flashembed/" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowFullscreen" value="true" /><param name="quality" value="high" /><param name="scale" value="noScale" /><param name="wmode" value="windowed" /><param name="flashvars" value="vxTemplate=http://publish.vx.roo.com/nypost/viral/VideoWindowViral.swf&vxSiteId=ac31f425-cfeb-43f7-a398-08185b2394d5&vxChannel=NY Post&vxClipId=1458_357379&vxClickToPlay=clip&vxTint=&vxServerBase=&vxBitrate=300&vxCore=http://publish.vx.roo.com/nypost/viral/vxCore.swf&" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://publish.vx.roo.com/nypost/viral/flashembed/" width="416" height="410" allowScriptAccess="always" allowFullscreen="true" quality="high" scale="noScale" wmode="windowed" flashvars="vxTemplate=http://publish.vx.roo.com/nypost/viral/VideoWindowViral.swf&vxSiteId=ac31f425-cfeb-43f7-a398-08185b2394d5&vxChannel=NY Post&vxClipId=1458_357379&vxClickToPlay=clip&vxTint=&vxServerBase=&vxBitrate=300&vxCore=http://publish.vx.roo.com/nypost/viral/vxCore.swf&" ></embed></object>Gregory Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02174480604474920143noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20956749.post-49919975870107405302008-07-30T14:36:00.002-04:002008-07-30T14:41:53.325-04:00ANOTHER ANGLE 30 - 07 - 08<div style="font-family: arial;"><strong>ANOTHER ANGLE</strong><br />News others won't tell you</div> <div style="font-family: arial;"> </div> <div style="font-family: arial;"> </div> <br /><div style="font-family: arial;"> </div> <div style="font-family: arial;"> </div> <div style="font-family: arial;"><br /><strong>NATIONAL:</strong><br /><br /><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;font-size:100%;" ><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/topstories/*http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080730/ap_on_el_pr/obama">Obama says he'll order review of executive orders (AP) </a></span><br /><span style="border-bottom: medium none; background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; -moz-background-clip: -moz-initial; -moz-background-origin: -moz-initial; -moz-background-inline-policy: -moz-initial; cursor: pointer;" class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1217389131_0">Barack Obama</span> told House Democrats on Tuesday that as president he would order his attorney general to scour <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1217389131_1">White House executive</span> orders and expunge any that "trample on liberty."<br /><br /><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;font-size:100%;" ><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/07/29/mccain-fails-mccains-commander-in-chief-test/">McCain Fails McCain’s Commander-in-Chief Test</a></span><br />Sadly, when it comes to the war in Iraq, it is the Arizona Republican who failed his own commander-in-chief exam. At almost every turn in the run-up to the invasion and the ensuing American occupation, McCain’s judgment was almost always wrong, often disastrously so. From his predictions of a short war, claims U.S. troops would be greeted as liberators and that the U.S. would find weapons of mass destruction to his announcements of mission accomplished, his ongoing confusion over friend and foe in Iraq and so much more, John McCain the would-be wartime president gets failing marks.<br /><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/07/29/another-mccain-involved-in-bank-collapse/">Another McCain Involved In Bank Collapse?</a><br /><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/07/29/another-mccain-gaffe/">Another McCain Gaffe?</a><br /><br /><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;font-size:100%;" ><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.roanoke.com/news/breaking/wb/171148">Aide to U.S. Senator Jim Webb found dead from apparent gunshot wound</a><br /><br /><br /><br /></span><span style="font-weight: bold;font-size:100%;" ><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.khou.com/topstories/stories/khou080728_tnt_armyrecruiters.eb16366.html">Caught on tape: Army recruiters threaten high school students</a></span><br /><span class="vitstorybody"><span class="vitstorybody">Army recruiters aren’t sticking to the program and are bullying and even lying to potential recruits and their families to keep them from dropping out.</span></span><br /><br /><br /><br /><div id="titlelink"><br /> <span style="font-weight: bold;font-size:100%;" ><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2008/07/top-advisor-to-us-military-confirms-war.html">Top Advisor to U.S. Military Confirms The War on Terror Is a Hoax: "There is No Battlefield Solution to Terrorism"</a><br /></span><p>A leading advisor to the U.S. military, the Rand Corporation, just released a new study called "<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG741/">How Terrorist Groups End: Lessons for Countering al Qa'ida</a>".<br /><br />The report confirms what we have been saying for years: the war on terror is a <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2008/05/neocons-admit-that-war-on-terror-was.html">hoax</a> which is actually <span style="font-style: italic;">weakening</span> national security (see <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/100102_against_war.html">this</a>, <span><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/23/AR2006092301130.html">this</a></span> and <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.counterpunch.org/feingold09292005.html">this</a>).<br /><br />As today's <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.rand.org/news/press/2008/07/29/">press release</a> about the study states:<br /></p><blockquote>"Terrorists should be perceived and described as criminals, not holy warriors, and our analysis suggests that there is no battlefield solution to terrorism."</blockquote>Can we drop the "war on terror" charade now?<br /><br /><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;font-size:100%;" ><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/node/35102">Pelosi Says She Would Impeach Bush If Somebody Knew of a Crime He'd Committed</a></span><br /></div><span style="font-weight: bold;font-size:100%;" ><br /></span><br /><br /><strong>INTERNATIONAL:<br /><br /><br /><br /></strong><span style="font-weight: bold;font-size:100%;" ><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/jul/29/food.internationalaidanddevelopment">Haiti: Mud cakes become staple diet as cost of food soars beyond a family's reach</a></span><br />In Cité Soleil, one of Port-au-Prince's worst slums, making the clay-based food is a major income earner. Mud cakes are the only inflation-proof food available to Haiti's poor.<br /><br />Brittle and gritty - and as revolting as they sound - these are "mud cakes". For years they have been consumed by impoverished pregnant women seeking calcium, a risky and medically unproven supplement, but now the cakes have become a staple for entire families.<br /><br />The only thing stopping an exodus are US coastguard patrols, said Herman Janvier, 30, a fishermen on Cap Haitian, a smuggling point. "People want out of here. It's like we're almost dead people."<br /><strong><br /><br /><br /></strong><span style="font-weight: bold;font-size:100%;" ><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Central_Asia/JG30Ag01.html">Russia takes control of Turkmen (world?) gas </a></span><br />Gazprom, Russia's energy leviathan, signed two major agreements in Ashgabat on Friday outlining a new scheme for purchase of Turkmen gas. The first one elaborates the price formation principles that will be guiding the Russian gas purchase from Turkmenistan during the next 20-year period. The second agreement is a unique one, making Gazprom the donor for local Turkmen energy projects. In essence, the two agreements ensure that Russia will keep control over Turkmen gas exports.<br /><strong><br /><br /><br /></strong><strong>BUSH CRIME FAMILY:<br /><br /><br /><br /></strong><span style="font-weight: bold;font-size:100%;" ><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bennet-kelley/bush-reveals-true-reason_b_115487.html">Bush Reveals True Reason for War in Push for Iraqi Agreement</a></span><br />All this was laid bare this month as the Iraqi government went on the offensive in its call for U.S. withdrawal by 2010. Far from embracing the desires of a sovereign Iraq, the White House instead feebly attempted to claim Prime Minister Maliki's statement was mistranslated, while the McCain camp argued that Iraqi's really want the U.S. to stay until 2020. Apparently their view of a "free Iraq" is an Iraq that is free to do what we tell them to do.<br /><strong><br /><br /><br /></strong><strong>OP-ED:<br /><br /><br /><br /></strong><span style="font-weight: bold;font-size:100%;" ><a rel="nofollow" style="color: blue;" target="_blank" href="http://www.hvpress.net/news/155/ARTICLE/4730/2008-07-09.html">Black moments in White continuum</a></span><br /><span style="font-size:85%;">Recently a friend told me there was no such animal as a "white moment." What whites do is a normal part of their system. "How can you call it a moment? It’s the way American society functions," she said. Since then I rephrased white moments into white continuum. There’s more to it than we can see with our eyes. It’s a unified spiritual connection they have with each other that shaped their thought patterns and this has worked for them for hundreds of years. Constant mental focus in many individual white Americans has created an unseemed thread between them that has manifested itself into material reality.</span><strong><br /><br /><br /><br /></strong></div> <div style="font-family: arial;"><strong>ECONOMY:<br /><br /><br /><br /></strong><span style="font-weight: bold;font-size:100%;" ><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25804814/page/2/">Economy hitting the elderly especially hard</a><br /></span>“We’re having to put people on waiting lists for home-delivered meals, and we have a waiting list for air conditioners.<br /><strong><br /><br /><br /></strong></div> <span style="font-family: arial;"><strong>SCIENCE&TECHNOLOGY:</strong><br /><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;font-size:100%;" ><br /></span></span><span style="font-weight: bold; font-family: arial;font-size:100%;" ><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7531046.stm">'Laser jumbo' testing moves ahead</a></span><br /><span style="font-family: arial;">According to an American Physical Society report in 2004, the Airborne Laser could shoot down a typical liquid-fuel intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) from up to 600km away. </span><br /><span style="font-family: arial;"><br /><br /><br /><strong>HEALTH&FITNESS:</strong><br /><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;font-size:100%;" ><br /></span></span><span style="font-weight: bold; font-family: arial;font-size:100%;" ><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2yxTIMNWZc">"The Business of Being Born" Documentary</a></span><br /><span style="font-family: arial;"><br /><br /><strong><br /><br /><br /><br /></strong><br /><br /></span><span style="font-family:arial;"><br /><br /></span>Gregory Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02174480604474920143noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20956749.post-80079483942445932092008-07-29T22:35:00.000-04:002008-07-29T22:37:08.257-04:00Watch the ad-Media Matters<object width="320" height="260"><param name="movie" value="http://mediamattersaction.org/static/flash/mediaplayer.swf"></param><param name="flashvars" value="file=http://mediamattersaction.org/static/video/TheyLoveMe.flv&image=http://mediamattersaction.org/static/video/TheyLoveMe.jpg&link=http://mediamattersaction.org/&linkformdisplay=true"></param><embed src="http://mediamattersaction.org/static/flash/mediaplayer.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" flashvars="file=http://mediamattersaction.org/static/video/TheyLoveMe.flv&image=http://mediamattersaction.org/static/video/TheyLoveMe.jpg&link=http://mediamattersaction.org/&linkformdisplay=true" width="320" height="260"></embed></object>Gregory Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02174480604474920143noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20956749.post-79791277307313682772008-07-29T02:35:00.001-04:002008-07-29T02:37:42.532-04:00What Ya Listening TO?<span style="font-size:130%;"><span style="font-family: arial; font-weight: bold;">Jean Luc Ponty</span></span><br /><br /><br /><br /><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/VCdH5ipBb5k&hl=en&fs=1"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/VCdH5ipBb5k&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>Gregory Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02174480604474920143noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20956749.post-79204833125313721632008-07-27T15:46:00.004-04:002008-07-27T16:14:29.726-04:00Memories of Music PastFour Cuts from a band I first saw live on the campus of Bowling Green State University in 1972, musical genius.<br /><br />The first piece <span>is from French TV. And it's the only footage I've ever seen of the first band.<br /><br />I present YES </span><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/U1b3R0y_0oY&hl=en&fs=1"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/U1b3R0y_0oY&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/71VYdM9S6nQ&hl=en&fs=1"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/71VYdM9S6nQ&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br /><br /><br /><br /><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/dfB_OjE5pGo&hl=en&fs=1"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/dfB_OjE5pGo&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br /><br /><br /><br /><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/yw_6RoAIUNI&hl=en&fs=1"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/yw_6RoAIUNI&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>Gregory Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02174480604474920143noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20956749.post-73391546073650102742008-07-17T22:35:00.001-04:002008-07-17T22:37:32.811-04:00Jesse, Thank God for Wide Stance Blessings<div style="font-family: arial; font-weight: bold;" class="storytitle" id="post-31073"><a href="http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/07/17/sen-larry-craig-dont-let-foreigners-%e2%80%9cjerk-us-around-by-the-gas-nozzle%e2%80%9d/" rel="bookmark">Sen Larry Craig: Don’t let foreigners “jerk us around by the gas nozzle”</a></div> <div class="postSubline" style="padding-top: 5px; font-family: arial;"><br /></div> <p style="font-family: arial;"><img src="http://static.crooksandliars.com/2008/07/craig-jerk.jpg" width="255" height="182" /> <br /></p> <img style="font-family: arial; font-weight: bold;" src="http://static.crooksandliars.com/mediaimages/video_wmv_icon.gif" alt="video_wmv" /><span style="font-family: arial; font-weight: bold;"> </span><a style="font-family: arial; font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.crooksandliars.com/Media/Download/31073/1/CSPAN2-Craig-NozzleJerk.wmv">Download</a><span style="font-family: arial; font-weight: bold;"> | </span><a style="font-family: arial; font-weight: bold;" href="javascript:playerPopUp('http://www.crooksandliars.com/Media/Play/31073/1/CSPAN2-Craig-NozzleJerk.wmv/','370','290')">Play</a><span style="font-family: arial; font-weight: bold;"> </span><img style="font-family: arial; font-weight: bold;" src="http://static.crooksandliars.com/mediaimages/video_mov_icon.gif" alt="video_mov" /><span style="font-family: arial; font-weight: bold;"> </span><a style="font-family: arial; font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.crooksandliars.com/Media/Download/31073/2/CSPAN2-Craig-NozzleJerk.mov">Download</a><span style="font-family: arial; font-weight: bold;"> | </span><a style="font-family: arial; font-weight: bold;" href="javascript:playerPopUp('http://www.crooksandliars.com/Media/Play/31073/2/CSPAN2-Craig-NozzleJerk.mov/','370','290')">Play</a><span style="font-family: arial;"><span style="font-weight: bold;"> </span> </span>Gregory Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02174480604474920143noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20956749.post-68367873841885036132008-07-16T22:32:00.000-04:002008-07-16T22:33:12.720-04:00Tom Tommorrow<div class="entry_body_text"> <p>The internets are full of declarative statements about satire these days, the most common of which being that "satire does not work unless it portrays its intended target." </p> <p>So let's consider this image:</p> <div align="center"><img alt="2008-07-16-sados1.jpg" src="http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2008-07-16-sados1.jpg" width="360" height="251" /></div> <p>Clearly this cartoon doesn't work at all, because there is <i>no way</i> for the reader to understand that its intended target was not Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden themselves. So let's see what we can do to clarify things:</p> <div align="center"><img alt="2008-07-16-sados2.jpg" src="http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2008-07-16-sados2.jpg" width="360" height="256" /></div> <p>That makes the intention of the cartoon clearer -- but there's still room for improvement.</p> <div align="center"><img alt="2008-07-16-sados3.jpg" src="http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2008-07-16-sados3.jpg" width="377" height="362" /></div> <p><br />There! That's much better! But maybe, just to be safe, we should take it one step further:</p> <div align="center"><img alt="2008-07-16-sados4.jpg" src="http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2008-07-16-sados4.jpg" width="432" height="480" /></div> <p>Okay then! With no room for misinterpretation whatsoever -- <i>that's</i> comedy gold!</p> <p>Remember: satire does not work unless it <i>literally portrays</i> the intended target!</p> </div>Gregory Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02174480604474920143noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20956749.post-41186130444486445842008-07-11T20:46:00.000-04:002008-07-11T20:49:59.349-04:00Another Angle 11 - 7 - 08<span style="font-weight: bold; font-family: arial;font-size:100%;" ><a href="http://www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/IndyMac.html" target="_blank">IndyMac fails</a></span><br /><span style="font-family: arial;"> <span style="font-size:85%;">On July 11, 2008, IndyMac Bank, F.S.B., Pasadena, CA was closed by the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) was named Conservator. All non-brokered insured deposit accounts and substantially all of the assets of IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. have been transferred to IndyMac Federal Bank, F.S.B. (IndyMac Federal Bank), Pasadena, CA ("assuming institution") a newly chartered full-service FDIC-insured institution. No advance notice is given to the public when a financial institution is closed.</span></span><br /> <br /> <span style="font-size:85%;"><span style="font-weight: bold; font-family: arial;">But We are Whiners, right?<br /></span><a style="font-weight: bold; font-family: arial;" href="http://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2008/07/whiners-phil-gramm-is-pimp-for.html" target="_blank">'Whiners?' Phil Gramm is a pimp for corporate criminals </a></span><br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <span style="font-weight: bold; font-family: arial;font-size:100%;" ><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/brown-blunders-in-pledge-to-secure-nigeria-oil-865035.html" target="_blank">Brown blunders in pledge to secure Nigeria oil</a></span><br /><span style="font-family: arial;"> <span style="font-size:85%;">Gordon Brown is being accused of preparing for a military adventure in Africa after he pledged to provide backing to the Nigerian security forces. His announcement prompted the collapse of a ceasefire in the oil-rich Niger Delta and helped to drive up crude oil prices on world markets.</span></span><br /> <br /> <br /> <span style="font-weight: bold; font-family: arial;font-size:100%;" ><br /><a href="http://www.aclu.org/safefree/nsaspying/faachallenge.html" target="_blank">ACLU Challenges Unconstitutional Spying Law </a></span><br /> <span style="font-size:85%;"><span style="font-weight: bold; font-family: arial;">What I ask you to remember is this...When Sen. Obama announced he would try to strip the immunity provision from the bill but would vote for it otherwise, he made a telling statement. He said it was a poorly written law. That signaled his strategy on this. He cannot get bogged down with a fight over something that WILL NOT pass constitutional muster. Now here come the folk that will make it go away.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold; font-family: arial;">Keep focused and keep fighting!</span></span> <br /> <span style="font-weight: bold; font-family: arial;font-size:100%;" ><br /><br /><br /><a href="http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/07/11/gay-bashing-alabama-ag-caught-having-gay-sex/" rel="bookmark">Gay-Bashing Alabama A.G. Caught Having Gay Sex?</a></span><br /> <span style="font-family: arial; font-weight: bold;font-size:85%;" ><em> </em></span><span style="font-family: lucida grande;font-size:85%;" ><em>What are the odds of a dude named Troy King getting caught in bed with a Homecoming King from Troy University? This seems like a wacky sitcom plot, on a gay porn channel. (Is this what </em><em>Will & Grace was about?)</em></span><br /> <span style="font-weight: bold; font-family: arial;font-size:100%;" ><br /><br /><br /><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://redress.cc/global/cking20080711">Iran's "provocative missile test"</a><br /></span><span style="font-size:85%;"><span style="font-family: arial;">If it were not so serious, it would be laughable that the USA </span><a style="font-family: arial;" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/7498214.stm">accuses</a><span style="font-family: arial;"> Iran of being provocative in testing a missile. Our government-controlled BBC shows a map with a potential threat to all countries within 2400 kilometres, as if the Iranians want to attack every country possible. </span><br /><br /><span style="font-family: arial;"> As provocation, I would have thought that a much better example was the </span><a style="font-family: arial;" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/07/07/080707fa_fact_hersh">approval</a><span style="font-family: arial;"> recently given by the US Congress for a USD 400 million package for clandestine operations against Iran.</span><br /><a rel="nofollow" style="font-weight: bold; font-family: arial;" target="_blank" href="http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=l1y47K29J1o">Ron Paul *Iranians Tested Missiles AFTER Israel had WAR GAMES!</a></span> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <span style="font-weight: bold; font-family: arial;font-size:100%;" ><a href="http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/07/11/flashback-2004-bush-interview-banned-in-america-an-insight-into-insanity/" rel="bookmark">Flashback: 2004 Bush Interview Banned In America - An Insight Into Insanity</a></span><br /><span style="font-family: arial;"> <span style="font-size:85%;">This 2004 interview should be required viewing for every journalism student. I admit that I had not seen this video until today, but apparently over a million people already have and I hope that millions more will watch it as well.</span></span>Gregory Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02174480604474920143noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20956749.post-54310205927152564062008-07-06T14:24:00.002-04:002008-07-09T13:13:37.299-04:00René Marie~Thanks,But I Don't DanceIt appears that this Sista has a large body of recorded work. How would I know I live in CincyNasty. The information black hole of the Multiverse. Yes Margaret,there are more than ours.<br /><br />So in keeping with this site's tradition of throwing some serious jams at you....<br /><br /><br /><br /><table width="286" bgcolor="#999966" border="0" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr valign="top"><td width="20" align="right"><a href="http://www.npr.org/ramfiles/watc/20020505.watc.06.ram"><img src="http://media.npr.org/programs/inrehearsal/images/inre_audioicon_brn.gif" border="0" /></a></td> <td width="266"><a href="http://www.npr.org/ramfiles/watc/20020505.watc.06.ram" class="brownboxlink">Birth of a Groove</a><br /><div class="caption">Listen in as René and her band work up a new tune, "You Can't See Me."<br /></div></td></tr> <tr valign="top"> <td width="20" align="right"><a href="http://www.npr.org/ramfiles/watc/20020505.watc.10.ram"><img src="http://media.npr.org/programs/inrehearsal/images/inre_audioicon_brn.gif" border="0" /></a></td> <td width="266"><a href="http://www.npr.org/ramfiles/watc/20020505.watc.10.ram" class="brownboxlink">Making It Live</a><br /><div class="caption">Hear what happens when René tries her new tune in public for the first time.</div></td> </tr> <tr valign="top"> <td width="20" align="right"><a href="http://www.npr.org/ramfiles/inrehearsal/rmarie/20020420.rmarie.vid.ram"><img src="http://media.npr.org/programs/inrehearsal/images/inre_videoicon_brn.gif" border="0" /></a></td> <td width="266"><a href="http://www.npr.org/ramfiles/inrehearsal/rmarie/20020420.rmarie.vid.ram" class="brownboxlink">Love for Sale</a><br /><div class="caption">Watch video of René and the band rehearsing the Cole Porter classic.</div></td> </tr> <tr valign="top"> <td width="20" align="right"><a href="http://www.npr.org/programs/inrehearsal/renemarie/inspiration.html"><img src="http://media.npr.org/programs/inrehearsal/images/inre_arrow_brn.gif" border="0" /></a></td> <td width="266"><a href="http://www.npr.org/programs/inrehearsal/renemarie/inspiration.html" class="brownboxlink">Inspired by Ella</a><br /><div class="caption">Visit the inspiration page to hear René mimic jazz greats Ella Fitzgerald and Sarah Vaughan.</div></td></tr></tbody></table><br />Thanks to NPR.<br /><br />So while others try to trash her, we take a good look at a great talent.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/anVfmBok0YY&hl=en&fs=1"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/anVfmBok0YY&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>Gregory Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02174480604474920143noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20956749.post-39260713254855820432008-07-06T13:53:00.001-04:002008-07-06T13:57:01.296-04:00I'm In Love!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<span style="font-family: arial; font-weight: bold;">Renee Marie was invited to sing the National Anthem at a state ceremony this week. Click the video to see what happened.</span><br /><br /><br /><br /><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/bSbHz_ZQRFc&hl=en&fs=1"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/bSbHz_ZQRFc&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>Gregory Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02174480604474920143noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20956749.post-48442394685120313182008-06-30T15:33:00.001-04:002008-06-30T15:40:51.108-04:00Preparing the Battlefield<span style=";font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:85%;" ><br /> <span style="font-size:100%;"><b> <span style="font-size:130%;">The Bush Administration steps up its secret moves against Iran.</span></b></span><br /> <br /> <b>By Seymour M. Hersh<br /> <span style="font-size:100%;"><br /> 29/06/08 "</span></b></span><span style="font-size:100%;"><a style="font-family: arial;" href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/07/07/080707fa_fact_hersh?currentPage=all"><b>New Yorker</b></a></span><span style=";font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:100%;" ><b>" -- -- L</b>ate last year, Congress agreed to a request from President Bush to fund a major escalation of covert operations against Iran, according to current and former military, intelligence, and congressional sources. These operations, for which the President sought up to four hundred million dollars, were described in a Presidential Finding signed by Bush, and are designed to destabilize the country’s religious leadership. The covert activities involve support of the minority Ahwazi Arab and Baluchi groups and other dissident organizations. They also include gathering intelligence about Iran’s suspected nuclear-weapons program.<br /> <br /> Clandestine operations against Iran are not new. United States Special Operations Forces have been conducting cross-border operations from southern Iraq, with Presidential authorization, since last year. These have included seizing members of Al Quds, the commando arm of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, and taking them to Iraq for interrogation, and the pursuit of “high-value targets” in the President’s war on terror, who may be captured or killed. But the scale and the scope of the operations in Iran, which involve the Central Intelligence Agency and the Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC), have now been significantly expanded, according to the current and former officials. Many of these activities are not specified in the new Finding, and some congressional leaders have had serious questions about their nature.<br /> <br /> Under federal law, a Presidential Finding, which is highly classified, must be issued when a covert intelligence operation gets under way and, at a minimum, must be made known to Democratic and Republican leaders in the House and the Senate and to the ranking members of their respective intelligence committees—the so-called Gang of Eight. Money for the operation can then be reprogrammed from previous appropriations, as needed, by the relevant congressional committees, which also can be briefed.<br /> <br /> “The Finding was focussed on undermining Iran’s nuclear ambitions and trying to undermine the government through regime change,” a person familiar with its contents said, and involved “working with opposition groups and passing money.” The Finding provided for a whole new range of activities in southern Iran and in the areas, in the east, where Baluchi political opposition is strong, he said.<br /> <br /> Although some legislators were troubled by aspects of the Finding, and “there was a significant amount of high-level discussion” about it, according to the source familiar with it, the funding for the escalation was approved. In other words, some members of the Democratic leadership—Congress has been under Democratic control since the 2006 elections—were willing, in secret, to go along with the Administration in expanding covert activities directed at Iran, while the Party’s presumptive candidate for President, Barack Obama, has said that he favors direct talks and diplomacy.<br /> <br /> The request for funding came in the same period in which the Administration was coming to terms with a National Intelligence Estimate, released in December, that concluded that Iran had halted its work on nuclear weapons in 2003. The Administration downplayed the significance of the N.I.E., and, while saying that it was committed to diplomacy, continued to emphasize that urgent action was essential to counter the Iranian nuclear threat. President Bush questioned the N.I.E.’s conclusions, and senior national-security officials, including Secretary of Defense Robert Gates and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, made similar statements. (So did Senator John McCain, the presumptive Republican Presidential nominee.) Meanwhile, the Administration also revived charges that the Iranian leadership has been involved in the killing of American soldiers in Iraq: both directly, by dispatching commando units into Iraq, and indirectly, by supplying materials used for roadside bombs and other lethal goods. (There have been questions about the accuracy of the claims; the Times, among others, has reported that “significant uncertainties remain about the extent of that involvement.”)<br /> <br /> Military and civilian leaders in the Pentagon share the White House’s concern about Iran’s nuclear ambitions, but there is disagreement about whether a military strike is the right solution. Some Pentagon officials believe, as they have let Congress and the media know, that bombing Iran is not a viable response to the nuclear-proliferation issue, and that more diplomacy is necessary.<br /> <br /> A Democratic senator told me that, late last year, in an off-the-record lunch meeting, Secretary of Defense Gates met with the Democratic caucus in the Senate. (Such meetings are held regularly.) Gates warned of the consequences if the Bush Administration staged a preëmptive strike on Iran, saying, as the senator recalled, “We’ll create generations of jihadists, and our grandchildren will be battling our enemies here in America.” Gates’s comments stunned the Democrats at the lunch, and another senator asked whether Gates was speaking for Bush and Vice-President Dick Cheney. Gates’s answer, the senator told me, was “Let’s just say that I’m here speaking for myself.” (A spokesman for Gates confirmed that he discussed the consequences of a strike at the meeting, but would not address what he said, other than to dispute the senator’s characterization.)<br /> <br /> The Joint Chiefs of Staff, whose chairman is Admiral Mike Mullen, were “pushing back very hard” against White House pressure to undertake a military strike against Iran, the person familiar with the Finding told me. Similarly, a Pentagon consultant who is involved in the war on terror said that “at least ten senior flag and general officers, including combatant commanders”—the four-star officers who direct military operations around the world—“have weighed in on that issue.”<br /> <br /> The most outspoken of those officers is Admiral William Fallon, who until recently was the head of U.S. Central Command, and thus in charge of American forces in Iraq and Afghanistan. In March, Fallon resigned under pressure, after giving a series of interviews stating his reservations about an armed attack on Iran. For example, late last year he told the Financial Times that the “real objective” of U.S. policy was to change the Iranians’ behavior, and that “attacking them as a means to get to that spot strikes me as being not the first choice.”<br /> <br /> Admiral Fallon acknowledged, when I spoke to him in June, that he had heard that there were people in the White House who were upset by his public statements. “Too many people believe you have to be either for or against the Iranians,” he told me. “Let’s get serious. Eighty million people live there, and everyone’s an individual. The idea that they’re only one way or another is nonsense.”<br /> <br /> When it came to the Iraq war, Fallon said, “Did I bitch about some of the things that were being proposed? You bet. Some of them were very stupid.”<br /> <br /> The Democratic leadership’s agreement to commit hundreds of millions of dollars for more secret operations in Iran was remarkable, given the general concerns of officials like Gates, Fallon, and many others. “The oversight process has not kept pace—it’s been coöpted” by the Administration, the person familiar with the contents of the Finding said. “The process is broken, and this is dangerous stuff we’re authorizing.”<br /> <br /> Senior Democrats in Congress told me that they had concerns about the possibility that their understanding of what the new operations entail differs from the White House’s. One issue has to do with a reference in the Finding, the person familiar with it recalled, to potential defensive lethal action by U.S. operatives in Iran. (In early May, the journalist Andrew Cockburn published elements of the Finding in Counterpunch, a newsletter and online magazine.)<br /> <br /> The language was inserted into the Finding at the urging of the C.I.A., a former senior intelligence official said. The covert operations set forth in the Finding essentially run parallel to those of a secret military task force, now operating in Iran, that is under the control of JSOC. Under the Bush Administration’s interpretation of the law, clandestine military activities, unlike covert C.I.A. operations, do not need to be depicted in a Finding, because the President has a constitutional right to command combat forces in the field without congressional interference. But the borders between operations are not always clear: in Iran, C.I.A. agents and regional assets have the language skills and the local knowledge to make contacts for the JSOC operatives, and have been working with them to direct personnel, matériel, and money into Iran from an obscure base in western Afghanistan. As a result, Congress has been given only a partial view of how the money it authorized may be used. One of JSOC’s task-force missions, the pursuit of “high-value targets,” was not directly addressed in the Finding. There is a growing realization among some legislators that the Bush Administration, in recent years, has conflated what is an intelligence operation and what is a military one in order to avoid fully informing Congress about what it is doing.<br /> <br /> “This is a big deal,” the person familiar with the Finding said. “The C.I.A. needed the Finding to do its traditional stuff, but the Finding does not apply to JSOC. The President signed an Executive Order after September 11th giving the Pentagon license to do things that it had never been able to do before without notifying Congress. The claim was that the military was ‘preparing the battle space,’ and by using that term they were able to circumvent congressional oversight. Everything is justified in terms of fighting the global war on terror.” He added, “The Administration has been fuzzing the lines; there used to be a shade of gray”—between operations that had to be briefed to the senior congressional leadership and those which did not—“but now it’s a shade of mush.”<br /> <br /> “The agency says we’re not going to get in the position of helping to kill people without a Finding,” the former senior intelligence official told me. He was referring to the legal threat confronting some agency operatives for their involvement in the rendition and alleged torture of suspects in the war on terror. “This drove the military people up the wall,” he said. As far as the C.I.A. was concerned, the former senior intelligence official said, “the over-all authorization includes killing, but it’s not as though that’s what they’re setting out to do. It’s about gathering information, enlisting support.” The Finding sent to Congress was a compromise, providing legal cover for the C.I.A. while referring to the use of lethal force in ambiguous terms.<br /> <br /> The defensive-lethal language led some Democrats, according to congressional sources familiar with their views, to call in the director of the C.I.A., Air Force General Michael V. Hayden, for a special briefing. Hayden reassured the legislators that the language did nothing more than provide authority for Special Forces operatives on the ground in Iran to shoot their way out if they faced capture or harm.<br /> <br /> The legislators were far from convinced. One congressman subsequently wrote a personal letter to President Bush insisting that “no lethal action, period” had been authorized within Iran’s borders. As of June, he had received no answer.<br /> <br /> Members of Congress have expressed skepticism in the past about the information provided by the White House. On March 15, 2005, David Obey, then the ranking Democrat on the Republican-led House Appropriations Committee, announced that he was putting aside an amendment that he had intended to offer that day, and that would have cut off all funding for national-intelligence programs unless the President agreed to keep Congress fully informed about clandestine military activities undertaken in the war on terror. He had changed his mind, he said, because the White House promised better coöperation. “The Executive Branch understands that we are not trying to dictate what they do,” he said in a floor speech at the time. “We are simply trying to see to it that what they do is consistent with American values and will not get the country in trouble.”<br /> <br /> Obey declined to comment on the specifics of the operations in Iran, but he did tell me that the White House reneged on its promise to consult more fully with Congress. He said, “I suspect there’s something going on, but I don’t know what to believe. Cheney has always wanted to go after Iran, and if he had more time he’d find a way to do it. We still don’t get enough information from the agencies, and I have very little confidence that they give us information on the edge.”<br /> <br /> None of the four Democrats in the Gang of Eight—Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senate Intelligence Committee chairman John D. Rockefeller IV, and House Intelligence Committee chairman Silvestre Reyes—would comment on the Finding, with some noting that it was highly classified. An aide to one member of the Democratic leadership responded, on his behalf, by pointing to the limitations of the Gang of Eight process. The notification of a Finding, the aide said, “is just that—notification, and not a sign-off on activities. Proper oversight of ongoing intelligence activities is done by fully briefing the members of the intelligence committee.” However, Congress does have the means to challenge the White House once it has been sent a Finding. It has the power to withhold funding for any government operation. The members of the House and Senate Democratic leadership who have access to the Finding can also, if they choose to do so, and if they have shared concerns, come up with ways to exert their influence on Administration policy. (A spokesman for the C.I.A. said, “As a rule, we don’t comment one way or the other on allegations of covert activities or purported findings.” The White House also declined to comment.)<br /> <br /> A member of the House Appropriations Committee acknowledged that, even with a Democratic victory in November, “it will take another year before we get the intelligence activities under control.” He went on, “We control the money and they can’t do anything without the money. Money is what it’s all about. But I’m very leery of this Administration.” He added, “This Administration has been so secretive.”<br /> <br /> One irony of Admiral Fallon’s departure is that he was, in many areas, in agreement with President Bush on the threat posed by Iran. They had a good working relationship, Fallon told me, and, when he ran CENTCOM, were in regular communication. On March 4th, a week before his resignation, Fallon testified before the Senate Armed Services Committee, saying that he was “encouraged” about the situations in Iraq and Afghanistan. Regarding the role played by Iran’s leaders, he said, “They’ve been absolutely unhelpful, very damaging, and I absolutely don’t condone any of their activities. And I have yet to see anything since I’ve been in this job in the way of a public action by Iran that’s been at all helpful in this region.”<br /> <br /> Fallon made it clear in our conversations that he considered it inappropriate to comment publicly about the President, the Vice-President, or Special Operations. But he said he had heard that people in the White House had been “struggling” with his views on Iran. “When I arrived at CENTCOM, the Iranians were funding every entity inside Iraq. It was in their interest to get us out, and so they decided to kill as many Americans as they could. And why not? They didn’t know who’d come out ahead, but they wanted us out. I decided that I couldn’t resolve the situation in Iraq without the neighborhood. To get this problem in Iraq solved, we had to somehow involve Iran and Syria. I had to work the neighborhood.”<br /> <br /> Fallon told me that his focus had been not on the Iranian nuclear issue, or on regime change there, but on “putting out the fires in Iraq.” There were constant discussions in Washington and in the field about how to engage Iran and, on the subject of the bombing option, Fallon said, he believed that “it would happen only if the Iranians did something stupid.”<br /> <br /> Fallon’s early retirement, however, appears to have been provoked not only by his negative comments about bombing Iran but also by his strong belief in the chain of command and his insistence on being informed about Special Operations in his area of responsibility. One of Fallon’s defenders is retired Marine General John J. (Jack) Sheehan, whose last assignment was as commander-in-chief of the U.S. Atlantic Command, where Fallon was a deputy. Last year, Sheehan rejected a White House offer to become the President’s “czar” for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. “One of the reasons the White House selected Fallon for CENTCOM was that he’s known to be a strategic thinker and had demonstrated those skills in the Pacific,” Sheehan told me. (Fallon served as commander-in-chief of U.S. forces in the Pacific from 2005 to 2007.) “He was charged with coming up with an over-all coherent strategy for Iran, Iraq, and Afghanistan, and, by law, the combatant commander is responsible for all military operations within his A.O.”—area of operations. “That was not happening,” Sheehan said. “When Fallon tried to make sense of all the overt and covert activity conducted by the military in his area of responsibility, a small group in the White House leadership shut him out.”<br /> <br /> The law cited by Sheehan is the 1986 Defense Reorganization Act, known as Goldwater-Nichols, which defined the chain of command: from the President to the Secretary of Defense, through the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and on to the various combatant commanders, who were put in charge of all aspects of military operations, including joint training and logistics. That authority, the act stated, was not to be shared with other echelons of command. But the Bush Administration, as part of its global war on terror, instituted new policies that undercut regional commanders-in-chief; for example, it gave Special Operations teams, at military commands around the world, the highest priority in terms of securing support and equipment. The degradation of the traditional chain of command in the past few years has been a point of tension between the White House and the uniformed military.<br /> <br /> “The coherence of military strategy is being eroded because of undue civilian influence and direction of nonconventional military operations,” Sheehan said. “If you have small groups planning and conducting military operations outside the knowledge and control of the combatant commander, by default you can’t have a coherent military strategy. You end up with a disaster, like the reconstruction efforts in Iraq.”<br /> <br /> Admiral Fallon, who is known as Fox, was aware that he would face special difficulties as the first Navy officer to lead CENTCOM, which had always been headed by a ground commander, one of his military colleagues told me. He was also aware that the Special Operations community would be a concern. “Fox said that there’s a lot of strange stuff going on in Special Ops, and I told him he had to figure out what they were really doing,” Fallon’s colleague said. “The Special Ops guys eventually figured out they needed Fox, and so they began to talk to him. Fox would have won his fight with Special Ops but for Cheney.”<br /> <br /> The Pentagon consultant said, “Fallon went down because, in his own way, he was trying to prevent a war with Iran, and you have to admire him for that.”<br /> <br /> In recent months, according to the Iranian media, there has been a surge in violence in Iran; it is impossible at this early stage, however, to credit JSOC or C.I.A. activities, or to assess their impact on the Iranian leadership. The Iranian press reports are being carefully monitored by retired Air Force Colonel Sam Gardiner, who has taught strategy at the National War College and now conducts war games centered on Iran for the federal government, think tanks, and universities. The Iranian press “is very open in describing the killings going on inside the country,” Gardiner said. It is, he said, “a controlled press, which makes it more important that it publishes these things. We begin to see inside the government.” He added, “Hardly a day goes by now we don’t see a clash somewhere. There were three or four incidents over a recent weekend, and the Iranians are even naming the Revolutionary Guard officers who have been killed.”<br /> <br /> Earlier this year, a militant Ahwazi group claimed to have assassinated a Revolutionary Guard colonel, and the Iranian government acknowledged that an explosion in a cultural center in Shiraz, in the southern part of the country, which killed at least twelve people and injured more than two hundred, had been a terrorist act and not, as it earlier insisted, an accident. It could not be learned whether there has been American involvement in any specific incident in Iran, but, according to Gardiner, the Iranians have begun publicly blaming the U.S., Great Britain, and, more recently, the C.I.A. for some incidents. The agency was involved in a coup in Iran in 1953, and its support for the unpopular regime of Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlavi—who was overthrown in 1979—was condemned for years by the ruling mullahs in Tehran, to great effect. “This is the ultimate for the Iranians—to blame the C.I.A.,” Gardiner said. “This is new, and it’s an escalation—a ratcheting up of tensions. It rallies support for the regime and shows the people that there is a continuing threat from the ‘Great Satan.’ ” In Gardiner’s view, the violence, rather than weakening Iran’s religious government, may generate support for it.<br /> <br /> Many of the activities may be being carried out by dissidents in Iran, and not by Americans in the field. One problem with “passing money” (to use the term of the person familiar with the Finding) in a covert setting is that it is hard to control where the money goes and whom it benefits. Nonetheless, the former senior intelligence official said, “We’ve got exposure, because of the transfer of our weapons and our communications gear. The Iranians will be able to make the argument that the opposition was inspired by the Americans. How many times have we tried this without asking the right questions? Is the risk worth it?” One possible consequence of these operations would be a violent Iranian crackdown on one of the dissident groups, which could give the Bush Administration a reason to intervene.<br /> <br /> A strategy of using ethnic minorities to undermine Iran is flawed, according to Vali Nasr, who teaches international politics at Tufts University and is also a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. “Just because Lebanon, Iraq, and Pakistan have ethnic problems, it does not mean that Iran is suffering from the same issue,” Nasr told me. “Iran is an old country—like France and Germany—and its citizens are just as nationalistic. The U.S. is overestimating ethnic tension in Iran.” The minority groups that the U.S. is reaching out to are either well integrated or small and marginal, without much influence on the government or much ability to present a political challenge, Nasr said. “You can always find some activist groups that will go and kill a policeman, but working with the minorities will backfire, and alienate the majority of the population.”<br /> <br /> The Administration may have been willing to rely on dissident organizations in Iran even when there was reason to believe that the groups had operated against American interests in the past. The use of Baluchi elements, for example, is problematic, Robert Baer, a former C.I.A. clandestine officer who worked for nearly two decades in South Asia and the Middle East, told me. “The Baluchis are Sunni fundamentalists who hate the regime in Tehran, but you can also describe them as Al Qaeda,” Baer told me. “These are guys who cut off the heads of nonbelievers—in this case, it’s Shiite Iranians. The irony is that we’re once again working with Sunni fundamentalists, just as we did in Afghanistan in the nineteen-eighties.” Ramzi Yousef, who was convicted for his role in the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center, and Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who is considered one of the leading planners of the September 11th attacks, are Baluchi Sunni fundamentalists.<br /> <br /> One of the most active and violent anti-regime groups in Iran today is the Jundallah, also known as the Iranian People’s Resistance Movement, which describes itself as a resistance force fighting for the rights of Sunnis in Iran. “This is a vicious Salafi organization whose followers attended the same madrassas as the Taliban and Pakistani extremists,” Nasr told me. “They are suspected of having links to Al Qaeda and they are also thought to be tied to the drug culture.” The Jundallah took responsibility for the bombing of a busload of Revolutionary Guard soldiers in February, 2007. At least eleven Guard members were killed. According to Baer and to press reports, the Jundallah is among the groups in Iran that are benefitting from U.S. support.<br /> <br /> The C.I.A. and Special Operations communities also have long-standing ties to two other dissident groups in Iran: the Mujahideen-e-Khalq, known in the West as the M.E.K., and a Kurdish separatist group, the Party for a Free Life in Kurdistan, or PJAK.<br /> <br /> The M.E.K. has been on the State Department’s terrorist list for more than a decade, yet in recent years the group has received arms and intelligence, directly or indirectly, from the United States. Some of the newly authorized covert funds, the Pentagon consultant told me, may well end up in M.E.K. coffers. “The new task force will work with the M.E.K. The Administration is desperate for results.” He added, “The M.E.K. has no C.P.A. auditing the books, and its leaders are thought to have been lining their pockets for years. If people only knew what the M.E.K. is getting, and how much is going to its bank accounts—and yet it is almost useless for the purposes the Administration intends.”<br /> <br /> The Kurdish party, PJAK, which has also been reported to be covertly supported by the United States, has been operating against Iran from bases in northern Iraq for at least three years. (Iran, like Iraq and Turkey, has a Kurdish minority, and PJAK and other groups have sought self-rule in territory that is now part of each of those countries.) In recent weeks, according to Sam Gardiner, the military strategist, there has been a marked increase in the number of PJAK armed engagements with Iranians and terrorist attacks on Iranian targets. In early June, the news agency Fars reported that a dozen PJAK members and four Iranian border guards were killed in a clash near the Iraq border; a similar attack in May killed three Revolutionary Guards and nine PJAK fighters. PJAK has also subjected Turkey, a member of NATO, to repeated terrorist attacks, and reports of American support for the group have been a source of friction between the two governments.<br /> <br /> Gardiner also mentioned a trip that the Iraqi Prime Minister, Nouri al-Maliki, made to Tehran in June. After his return, Maliki announced that his government would ban any contact between foreigners and the M.E.K.—a slap at the U.S.’s dealings with the group. Maliki declared that Iraq was not willing to be a staging ground for covert operations against other countries. This was a sign, Gardiner said, of “Maliki’s increasingly choosing the interests of Iraq over the interests of the United States.” In terms of U.S. allegations of Iranian involvement in the killing of American soldiers, he said, “Maliki was unwilling to play the blame-Iran game.” Gardiner added that Pakistan had just agreed to turn over a Jundallah leader to the Iranian government. America’s covert operations, he said, “seem to be harming relations with the governments of both Iraq and Pakistan and could well be strengthening the connection between Tehran and Baghdad.”<br /> <br /> The White House’s reliance on questionable operatives, and on plans involving possible lethal action inside Iran, has created anger as well as anxiety within the Special Operations and intelligence communities. JSOC’s operations in Iran are believed to be modelled on a program that has, with some success, used surrogates to target the Taliban leadership in the tribal territories of Waziristan, along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border. But the situations in Waziristan and Iran are not comparable.<br /> <br /> In Waziristan, “the program works because it’s small and smart guys are running it,” the former senior intelligence official told me. “It’s being executed by professionals. The N.S.A., the C.I.A., and the D.I.A.”—the Defense Intelligence Agency—“are right in there with the Special Forces and Pakistani intelligence, and they’re dealing with serious bad guys.” He added, “We have to be really careful in calling in the missiles. We have to hit certain houses at certain times. The people on the ground are watching through binoculars a few hundred yards away and calling specific locations, in latitude and longitude. We keep the Predator loitering until the targets go into a house, and we have to make sure our guys are far enough away so they don’t get hit.” One of the most prominent victims of the program, the former official said, was Abu Laith al-Libi, a senior Taliban commander, who was killed on January 31st, reportedly in a missile strike that also killed eleven other people.<br /> <br /> A dispatch published on March 26th by the Washington Post reported on the increasing number of successful strikes against Taliban and other insurgent units in Pakistan’s tribal areas. A follow-up article noted that, in response, the Taliban had killed “dozens of people” suspected of providing information to the United States and its allies on the whereabouts of Taliban leaders. Many of the victims were thought to be American spies, and their executions—a beheading, in one case—were videotaped and distributed by DVD as a warning to others.<br /> <br /> It is not simple to replicate the program in Iran. “Everybody’s arguing about the high-value-target list,” the former senior intelligence official said. “The Special Ops guys are pissed off because Cheney’s office set up priorities for categories of targets, and now he’s getting impatient and applying pressure for results. But it takes a long time to get the right guys in place.”<br /> <br /> The Pentagon consultant told me, “We’ve had wonderful results in the Horn of Africa with the use of surrogates and false flags—basic counterintelligence and counter-insurgency tactics. And we’re beginning to tie them in knots in Afghanistan. But the White House is going to kill the program if they use it to go after Iran. It’s one thing to engage in selective strikes and assassinations in Waziristan and another in Iran. The White House believes that one size fits all, but the legal issues surrounding extrajudicial killings in Waziristan are less of a problem because Al Qaeda and the Taliban cross the border into Afghanistan and back again, often with U.S. and NATO forces in hot pursuit. The situation is not nearly as clear in the Iranian case. All the considerations—judicial, strategic, and political—are different in Iran.”<br /> <br /> He added, “There is huge opposition inside the intelligence community to the idea of waging a covert war inside Iran, and using Baluchis and Ahwazis as surrogates. The leaders of our Special Operations community all have remarkable physical courage, but they are less likely to voice their opposition to policy. Iran is not Waziristan.”<br /> <br /> A Gallup poll taken last November, before the N.I.E. was made public, found that seventy-three per cent of those surveyed thought that the United States should use economic action and diplomacy to stop Iran’s nuclear program, while only eighteen per cent favored direct military action. Republicans were twice as likely as Democrats to endorse a military strike. Weariness with the war in Iraq has undoubtedly affected the public’s tolerance for an attack on Iran. This mood could change quickly, however. The potential for escalation became clear in early January, when five Iranian patrol boats, believed to be under the command of the Revolutionary Guard, made a series of aggressive moves toward three Navy warships sailing through the Strait of Hormuz. Initial reports of the incident made public by the Pentagon press office said that the Iranians had transmitted threats, over ship-to-ship radio, to “explode” the American ships. At a White House news conference, the President, on the day he left for an eight-day trip to the Middle East, called the incident “provocative” and “dangerous,” and there was, very briefly, a sense of crisis and of outrage at Iran. “TWO MINUTES FROM WAR” was the headline in one British newspaper.<br /> <br /> The crisis was quickly defused by Vice-Admiral Kevin Cosgriff, the commander of U.S. naval forces in the region. No warning shots were fired, the Admiral told the Pentagon press corps on January 7th, via teleconference from his headquarters, in Bahrain. “Yes, it’s more serious than we have seen, but, to put it in context, we do interact with the Iranian Revolutionary Guard and their Navy regularly,” Cosgriff said. “I didn’t get the sense from the reports I was receiving that there was a sense of being afraid of these five boats.”<br /> <br /> Admiral Cosgriff’s caution was well founded: within a week, the Pentagon acknowledged that it could not positively identify the Iranian boats as the source of the ominous radio transmission, and press reports suggested that it had instead come from a prankster long known for sending fake messages in the region. Nonetheless, Cosgriff’s demeanor angered Cheney, according to the former senior intelligence official. But a lesson was learned in the incident: The public had supported the idea of retaliation, and was even asking why the U.S. didn’t do more. The former official said that, a few weeks later, a meeting took place in the Vice-President’s office. “The subject was how to create a casus belli between Tehran and Washington,” he said.<br /> <br /> In June, President Bush went on a farewell tour of Europe. He had tea with Queen Elizabeth II and dinner with Nicolas Sarkozy and Carla Bruni, the President and First Lady of France. The serious business was conducted out of sight, and involved a series of meetings on a new diplomatic effort to persuade the Iranians to halt their uranium-enrichment program. (Iran argues that its enrichment program is for civilian purposes and is legal under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.) Secretary of State Rice had been involved with developing a new package of incentives. But the Administration’s essential negotiating position seemed unchanged: talks could not take place until Iran halted the program. The Iranians have repeatedly and categorically rejected that precondition, leaving the diplomatic situation in a stalemate; they have not yet formally responded to the new incentives.<br /> <br /> The continuing impasse alarms many observers. Joschka Fischer, the former German Foreign Minister, recently wrote in a syndicated column that it may not “be possible to freeze the Iranian nuclear program for the duration of the negotiations to avoid a military confrontation before they are completed. Should this newest attempt fail, things will soon get serious. Deadly serious.” When I spoke to him last week, Fischer, who has extensive contacts in the diplomatic community, said that the latest European approach includes a new element: the willingness of the U.S. and the Europeans to accept something less than a complete cessation of enrichment as an intermediate step. “The proposal says that the Iranians must stop manufacturing new centrifuges and the other side will stop all further sanction activities in the U.N. Security Council,” Fischer said, although Iran would still have to freeze its enrichment activities when formal negotiations begin. “This could be acceptable to the Iranians—if they have good will.”<br /> <br /> The big question, Fischer added, is in Washington. “I think the Americans are deeply divided on the issue of what to do about Iran,” he said. “Some officials are concerned about the fallout from a military attack and others think an attack is unavoidable. I know the Europeans, but I have no idea where the Americans will end up on this issue.”<br /> <br /> There is another complication: American Presidential politics. Barack Obama has said that, if elected, he would begin talks with Iran with no “self-defeating” preconditions (although only after diplomatic groundwork had been laid). That position has been vigorously criticized by John McCain. The Washington Post recently quoted Randy Scheunemann, the McCain campaign’s national-security director, as stating that McCain supports the White House’s position, and that the program be suspended before talks begin. What Obama is proposing, Scheunemann said, “is unilateral cowboy summitry.”<br /> <br /> Scheunemann, who is known as a neoconservative, is also the McCain campaign’s most important channel of communication with the White House. He is a friend of David Addington, Dick Cheney’s chief of staff. I have heard differing accounts of Scheunemann’s influence with McCain; though some close to the McCain campaign talk about him as a possible national-security adviser, others say he is someone who isn’t taken seriously while “telling Cheney and others what they want to hear,” as a senior McCain adviser put it.<br /> <br /> It is not known whether McCain, who is the ranking Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, has been formally briefed on the operations in Iran. At the annual conference of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, in June, Obama repeated his plea for “tough and principled diplomacy.” But he also said, along with McCain, that he would keep the threat of military action against Iran on the table. </span>Gregory Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02174480604474920143noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20956749.post-88072072095103440612008-06-25T17:44:00.002-04:002008-06-25T17:51:56.070-04:00BINGO!<p style="font-family:arial;"><span style="font-size:85%;"><span style="color: rgb(255, 153, 0);font-size:6;" >From the Department for Transport, June 25, 2008</span></span></p><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:85%;" ><b> </b></span><p style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);font-family:arial;" align="center"><span style="font-size:85%;"><b><span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);font-size:130%;" >The Thirty-Four Minute Gap</span></b></span></p> <p style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);font-family:arial;" align="center"><span style="font-size:85%;"> </span></p> <p style="color: rgb(102, 0, 204);font-family:arial;" align="center"><span style="font-size:85%;"> <span style="color: rgb(51, 255, 51);"><i>"[If the Air Traffic Control Center sector] has no datablock or other information on it, the military will usually scramble an intercept flight. Essentially always they turn out to be private pilots… not talking to anybody, who stray too far outside the boundary, then get picked up on their way back in. But, procedures are procedures, and they will likely find two F-18s on their tail within 10 or so minutes."</i> -- Air Traffic Control Center, ‘ATCC Controller’s Read Binder’, Xavier Software, August 1998.</span></span></p> <p style="text-align: left;font-family:arial;"><span style="font-size:85%;"> </span></p> <p style="text-align: left;font-family:arial;"><span style="font-size:85%;">On October 25, 1999 at 09:19 EDT a Learjet Model 35, registration N47BA, departed Orlando International Airport, Orlando, Florida bound for Dallas-Love Field, Dallas, Texas with four passengers on board, including U.S. Open golf champion Payne Stewart.<sup>1</sup> After several radio exchanges with Jacksonville Air Route Traffic Control Center (JARTCC), JARTCC at 09:33 EDT instructed N47BA to change radio frequencies and contact another JARTCC controller. There was no reply. Approximately four hours later the Learjet, off course, nose-dived into the open marshy fields of Edmunds, South Dakota, killing all on board. </span></p> <p style="font-family:arial;"><span style="font-size:85%;">Before the crash of the Learjet there ensued a curious four-hour chase conducted by the United States Air Force and units of the Air National Guard (ANG). After several intercepts and pullbacks by military interceptors, the lead pilot of a pair of Oklahoma ANG F-16s maneuvered along side Stewart’s Learjet for a close-up inspection. The pilot reported, "It's looking like the cockpit window is iced over".<sup>2</sup> Payne Stewart’s Learjet, it seems, had lost pressurization, killing all on board. </span></p> <p style="font-family:arial;"><span style="font-size:85%;">Just as curious was the NTSB Aircraft Accident Brief<sup>3</sup> on the tragedy that was adopted<sup> </sup>three weeks after George W. Bush’s election in 2000, and thirteen months after the crash. The timeline the NTSB provided of the Air Force response to the off course Learjet not only contradicted the initial media reports’ of the Air Force’s own timeline of the crash, but conspicuously omitted one critical entry on the Air Force’s response. </span></p> <p style="font-family:arial;"><span style="font-size:85%;">The NTSB timeline on the Air Force’s response begins at 09:52 CDT, one-hour and eighteen minutes after JARTCC lost contact with the craft:</span></p> <p style="color: rgb(102, 0, 204);font-family:arial;"><span style="font-size:85%;"><span style="font-size:85%;"><span style="color: rgb(102, 0, 204);">"About 0952 CDT, a USAF F-16 test pilot from the 40th Flight Test Squadron at Eglin Air Force Base (AFB), Florida, was vectored to within 8 nm of N47BA. About 0954 CDT, at a range of 2,000 feet from the accident airplane and an altitude of about 46,400 feet, the test pilot made two radio calls to N47BA but did not receive a response. About 1000 CDT, the test pilot began a visual inspection of N47BA."</span><sup>4</sup></span></span></p><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:85%;" > </span><p style="font-family:arial;"><span style="font-size:85%;">The published media accounts of the Air Force’s timeline paints an altogether different sequence of events for the Air Force’s response, and takes note of another aspect of the Air Force’s response that for some reason the NTSB was reluctant to report on.</span></p> <p style="font-family:arial;"><span style="font-size:85%;">ABC News.com on October 25<sup>th</sup> reported:</span></p> <p style="color: rgb(102, 0, 204);font-family:arial;"><span style="font-size:85%;"><span style="color: rgb(102, 0, 204);">"According to an Air Force summary, after contact was initially lost, two F-15s from Tyndall Air Force Base, Fla., were sent to track the Learjet. The F-15s pulled back and two F-16s in the air from Eglin Air Force Base, Fla., moved in to track the aircraft."</span><sup style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">5</sup> </span></p> <p style="font-family:arial;"><span style="font-size:85%;">The Dallas Morning News on October 26<sup>th</sup> reported:</span></p> <p style="color: rgb(102, 0, 204);font-family:arial;"><span style="font-size:85%;"><span style="color: rgb(51, 255, 255);"><span style="color: rgb(102, 0, 204);">"Instead, according to an Air Force timeline, a series of military planes provided an emergency escort to the stricken Lear, beginning with a pair of F-16 Falcons from the Air National Guard at Tyndall Air Force Base, Fla., about 20 minutes after ground controllers lost contact. An F-16 and an A-10 Warthog attack plane from Eglin Air Force Base, Fla., took up the chase a few minutes later and were trailing the Lear when it climbed abruptly from 39,000 to 44,000 feet at 9:52 a.m. CDT.</span><sup> </sup></span></span></p> <p style="color: rgb(102, 0, 204);font-family:arial;"><span style="font-size:85%;"><span style="color: rgb(102, 0, 204);">Fifteen minutes later, the F-16 intercepted the Lear, the pilot reporting no movement in the cockpit."</span><sup style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">6</sup> </span></p> <p style="font-family:arial;"><span style="font-size:85%;">Note the dissimilarities between the Air Force’s timeline and the NTSB’s timeline. The NTSB timeline altogether avoids mentioning an earlier request for assistance to a pair of F-15s from Tyndall Air Force Base, who we learn were actually escorting the Learjet twenty minutes after JARTCC lost contact with it. Now if we say it took five minutes to alert the Eglin fighters once the Tyndall fighters had intercepted the Learjet, and add those five minutes to the twenty minutes it took the Tyndall fighters to initially make contact with the Learjet, then add the remaining fifteen minutes it took the Eglin fighters to actually intercept the Learjet, that gives us an arrival/escort time of 09:18 CDT for the Eglin fighters, not 09:52 CDT as chronicled in the NTSB timeline. That is a thirty-four minute gap!</span></p> <p style="font-family:arial;"><span style="font-size:85%;">Is there any official account that would substantiate this thirty-four minute gap; that the Eglin fighters were escorting the Learjet thirty-four minutes earlier than the NTSB timeline admits to? As it happens there is. CNN.com on October 26<sup>th</sup> reported:</span></p> <p style="font-family:arial;"><span style="font-size:85%;"><span style="color: rgb(102, 0, 204);">"An Air Force spokesman says two U.S. Air Force F-15s from Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, intercepted the plane shortly after it lost contact with aircraft controllers, and followed it to Missouri."</span><sup>7</sup> </span></p> <p style="font-family:arial;"><span style="font-size:85%;">The Air Force spokesman said the Eglin fighters intercepted the Learjet <i>shortly</i> after contact was lost with the aircraft. Well, one-hour and eighteen minutes doesn’t register with me as meaning <i>shortly</i> after! </span></p> <p style="font-family:arial;"><span style="font-size:85%;">So according to the Air Force timeline we have two interceptions of Payne Stewart’s Learjet <i>before</i> the NTSB chronicled 09:52 CDT interception. The first interception was by a pair of F-15s from Tyndall Air Force Base at approximately 08:58 CDT, with a second interception by Eglin fighters no later than 09:18 CDT, not 09:52 CDT as claimed by the NTSB.</span></p> <p style="font-family:arial;"><span style="font-size:85%;">In order to facilitate the Bush administration’s 2001 false flag attacks,<sup>8</sup> the bureaucracy within the NTSB purposefully doctored their timeline of the Air Force’s response to Payne Stewart’s Learjet. Longer intercept times were needed in the Payne Stewart incident <i>if</i> the tardy NORAD response times on 9/11 were to be accepted by the public as nothing unusual.</span></p> <p style="font-family:arial;"><span style="font-size:85%;"> ----------------------------------------------------</span></p> <p style="font-family:arial;">1. <a href="http://www.ntsb.gov/publictn/2000/AAB0001.htm"><span style="color: rgb(128, 0, 128);font-size:85%;" >http://www.ntsb.gov/publictn/2000/AAB0001.htm</span></a></p><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:85%;" > </span><p style="font-family:arial;"><span style="font-size:85%;">2. Ibid (earlier an F-16 from Eglin Air Force Base did a close-up visual of the Learjet and reported that the cockpit windows were opaque, as if condensation or ice covered the inside).</span></p> <p face="arial"><span style="font-size:85%;">3. http://www.ntsb.gov/publictn/A_Acc1.htm</span></p> <p style="font-family: arial;">4. <a href="http://www.ntsb.gov/publictn/2000/AAB0001.htm"><span style="color: rgb(128, 0, 128);font-size:85%;" >http://www.ntsb.gov/publictn/2000/AAB0001.htm</span></a></p><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:85%;" > </span><p style="font-family: arial;">5. <a href="http://emperors-clothes.com/9-11backups/abclearjet.htm"><span style="color: rgb(128, 0, 128);font-size:85%;" >http://emperors-clothes.com/9-11backups/abclearjet.htm</span></a></p><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:85%;" > </span><p style="font-family: arial;">6. <a href="http://www.wanttoknow.info/991026dallasmorningnews"><span style="color: rgb(128, 0, 128);font-size:85%;" >http://www.wanttoknow.info/991026dallasmorningnews</span></a></p><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:85%;" > </span><p style="font-family: arial;">7. <a href="http://www.cnn.com/US/9910/25/wayward.jet.07/"><span style="color: rgb(128, 0, 128);font-size:85%;" >http://www.cnn.com/US/9910/25/wayward.jet.07/</span></a></p><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:85%;" > </span><p style="font-family: arial;"><span style="font-size:85%;">8. See: <u>Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources For a New Century</u> (A Report of The Project for the New American Century, September 2000), whose signatories included four soon to be senior officers in the Bush administration. The key sentence in the report providing motive for the 9/11 attacks reads, "Further, the process of transformation [control of space and cyberspace; global missile defenses; the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf whether or not Saddam Hussein remains in power; precluding the rise of a great power rival, and shaping the international security order in line with American principles and interests'; and for the US to 'fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theatre wars' as a 'core mission'], even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor." </span><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/9651/Rebuilding-Americas-Defenses-PNAC"><span style="color: rgb(128, 0, 128);font-size:85%;" >http://www.scribd.com/doc/9651/Rebuilding-Americas-Defenses-PNAC</span></a><span style="font-size:85%;">, p. 51.</span></p>Gregory Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02174480604474920143noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20956749.post-80954187382406305072008-06-24T17:01:00.001-04:002008-06-24T17:33:04.205-04:00When You're in a Hole, Stop Digging!<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/d1wSZBTAXRs&hl=en"><param name="wmode" value="transparent"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/d1wSZBTAXRs&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object><br /><div><br /><br /><a style="color: rgb(51, 204, 255);" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://logoblink.com/2008/03/23/usa-polit-logos-2008-1960/"><span style="color: rgb(64, 64, 255);font-size:130%;" >USA political election logos 2008 - 1960</span></a></div> <div><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Brings back some frightening memories!</span><br /></div><br /><br /><br /><br /><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/1uwOL4rB-go&hl=en"><param name="wmode" value="transparent"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/1uwOL4rB-go&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object><br /><br /><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">This is wrong on so many levels!</span>Gregory Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02174480604474920143noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20956749.post-33917301965162822952008-06-23T19:35:00.003-04:002008-06-23T20:01:06.966-04:00Over the Rainbow<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/UKTyTdVsEcs&hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/UKTyTdVsEcs&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br /><br /><br />Dody Goodman RIP<br />The first lady you see in the clip<br /><br /><br />And...<br /><br /><br /><br /><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/aRCKoT1HY3U&hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/aRCKoT1HY3U&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br /><br /><br />Funny, funny man.<br />George Carlin RIPGregory Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02174480604474920143noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20956749.post-15961593759989981372008-06-20T23:14:00.012-04:002008-06-20T23:47:00.012-04:00Another Angle 21 - 06 - 08<h2><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg3aVyrcNr-JR8ffBbWXqbBRY3cRdZw0J0ZkGYUS-cvms7eYOBV9QrSkR-lgp12DiD2uDc5B0UK3n1rUXzHo8JIbOVahUtR_jAzCiKWFv4QGMorB7R9yblDePYC7a9exPvyycwfvw/s1600-h/s-MCCAIN-SCARED-large.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg3aVyrcNr-JR8ffBbWXqbBRY3cRdZw0J0ZkGYUS-cvms7eYOBV9QrSkR-lgp12DiD2uDc5B0UK3n1rUXzHo8JIbOVahUtR_jAzCiKWFv4QGMorB7R9yblDePYC7a9exPvyycwfvw/s200/s-MCCAIN-SCARED-large.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5214172446736094610" border="0" /></a></h2><br /><div style="font-family:arial;"><strong><u><span style="font-size:180%;">ANOTHER ANGLE</span></u></strong> </div> <div style="font-family:arial;"><strong><u><span style="font-size:130%;">News others won't tell you</span></u></strong><br /><br /><strong><u><span style="font-size:130%;"><br /></span></u></strong><br /><h2><a href="http://thedailyvoice.com/voice/2008/06/john-mccain-i-really-didnt-lov-000779.php">John McCain: 'I really didn't love America u</a><a href="http://thedailyvoice.com/voice/2008/06/john-mccain-i-really-didnt-lov-000779.php">ntil I was</a><a href="http://thedailyvoice.com/voice/2008/06/john-mccain-i-really-didnt-lov-000779.php"> deprived of</a><a href="http://thedailyvoice.com/voice/2008/06/john-mccain-i-really-didnt-lov-000779.php"> her company'</a></h2><br /><br /><br /></div> <div style="font-family: arial;" face="arial"><u><strong>NATIONAL:<br /><br /><br /></strong></u><br /><span style="font-size:100%;"><a rel="nofollow" style="font-weight: bold;" target="_blank" href="http://www.courierpostonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080620/BUSINESS/806200355&referrer=FRONTPAGECAROUSEL">State finds gas-station rip-offs</a></span><br /><span style="font-size:85%;">The state crackdown comes amid more complaints from New Jersey drivers that they are being ripped off as they pay gas prices hovering near $4 a gallon -- not as bad as many other places in the country but still more than $1 per gallon higher than the $2.91 average price of a year ago.<br /></span><p><span style="font-size:85%;"> The investigation, Milgram said, was "deeply troubling," because it found that one-third of the inspected stations had violations. A similar crackdown after Hurricane Katrina in 2005 found that a quarter of the inspected stations had violations.</span><br /></p><br /><br /><div id="titlelink"><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;font-size:100%;" ><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4632087.stm">US faces prison ship allegations</a></span><span style="font-weight: bold;font-size:100%;" ><br /></span><span style="font-size:85%;">The United Nations says it has learned of serious allegations that the US is secretly detaining terrorism suspects, notably on American military ships.</span><br /><br /><br /><br /><span style="font-size:100%;"><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/06/washington/06cnd-leak.html?_r=1&emc=eta1&oref=slogin"><strong>In Court Filings, Cheney Aide Says Bush Approved Leak</strong></a></span><br /><span style="font-size:85%;">President Bush authorized Vice President <a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/c/dick_cheney/index.html?inline=nyt-per" title="More articles about Dick Cheney.">Dick Cheney</a> in July 2003 to permit Mr. Cheney's chief of sta</span> <span style="font-size:85%;">ff, <a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/l/i_lewis_libby_jr/index.html?inline=nyt-per" title="More articles about I. Lewis Libby Jr.">I. Lewis Libby Jr.</a>, to leak key portions of a classified prewar intelligence estimate on Iraq, according to Mr. Libby's grand jury testimony.<br /><span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">UHH...Doy!</span></span><br /><br /><br /><h2><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgCG8qxrPDmhDlOgFNCqBSnZeJcohH3PlPThQ99_xUH5uMCdooPHO9qxJ2XGNl8TS8InWFbIS8fcZsrc3UijQTrMXBMQ-3c4c48AsrEFSSzJrL2zfcDfGqjwgNuZYpSDYdeMw3dNQ/s1600-h/thewisdomofyouth.bmp"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgCG8qxrPDmhDlOgFNCqBSnZeJcohH3PlPThQ99_xUH5uMCdooPHO9qxJ2XGNl8TS8InWFbIS8fcZsrc3UijQTrMXBMQ-3c4c48AsrEFSSzJrL2zfcDfGqjwgNuZYpSDYdeMw3dNQ/s200/thewisdomofyouth.bmp" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5214171519742339298" border="0" /></a></h2><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;font-size:100%;" ><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2008/06/19/2008-06-19_hillary_clinton_struggles_with_debt.html">Hillary Clinton</a></span> <span style="font-weight: bold;font-size:100%;" ><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2008/06/19/2008-06-19_hillary_clinton_struggles_with_debt.html"> struggles with debt</a></span><br /><span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);font-size:85%;" >Now, ask me if I give a damn?</span><br /><br /><br /><br /><span style="color: rgb(64, 64, 255); text-decoration: underline; font-weight: bold;font-size:100%;" class="artname" ><br /><br /><br /><a href="http://www.finalcall.com/artman/publish/article_4875.shtml" style="text-decoration: none;">Right wing attacks on Michelle Obama hit new low</a><br /></span><span class="arttext" style="font-size:85%;">Despite the vicious and seemingly ubiquitous critical comments, the 44-year-old Princeton University and Harvard Law School educated</span> <span class="arttext" style="font-size:85%;"> executive has carried herself with dignity and class throughout the entire campaign gaining the admiration of many.</span><br /></div><br /><u><strong><br /><br /></strong></u><span style="font-weight: bold;font-size:100%;" ><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.alternet.org/mediaculture/88792">Is the Tyranny of Right-Wing Radio Coming to an End?</a><br /></span><span style="font-size:85%;">Conservative fears of an impending Democratic attack on talk radio - dubbed the "Hush Rush" effort in an homage to top-rated radio talker Rush Limbaugh -- continue to escalate, despite ample evidence that such an assault is unlikely to occur when (as is likely) Democrats sweep back into power in the forthcoming elections in November.</span><br /><br /><br /><br /><h2><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiUKqqdvFsYXsGVZYqBdO0vFCxseHZ1n0CRashjQizFxyK3h5E7OHLlz5LdB3e3V9kiuR4AAfX3flEYmpYW-k6WD1fIitnZO9Sg2uUXrLVQDcBcly93YbDkpxwFx_P7xZxvhujs5w/s1600-h/bc-080620-scanner-2.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiUKqqdvFsYXsGVZYqBdO0vFCxseHZ1n0CRashjQizFxyK3h5E7OHLlz5LdB3e3V9kiuR4AAfX3flEYmpYW-k6WD1fIitnZO9Sg2uUXrLVQDcBcly93YbDkpxwFx_P7xZxvhujs5w/s200/bc-080620-scanner-2.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5214170219359791634" border="0" /></a></h2> <span style="font-weight: bold;font-size:100%;" ><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.cbc.ca/canada/british-columbia/story/2008/06/20/bc-virtually-naked-airport-scanner.html">Passengers virtually stripped naked by 3-D airport scanner</a></span><br /><span style="font-size:85%;">The new body </span> <span style="font-size:85%;">imager unveiled on Thursday uses high frequency electromagnetic waves known as millimetre waves to create a</span> <span style="font-size:85%;"> detailed 3-D image of what a person looks like underneath their clothes.</span><br /><br /><br /><u><strong><br /></strong></u><span style="text-decoration: underline; font-weight: bold;font-size:85%;" >INTERNATIONAL:</span><br /><br /><br /><span style="font-size:100%;"> <a rel="nofollow" style="font-weight: bold;" target="_blank" href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/africa/article4183359.ece">Zimbabweans set to vote with their feet</a></span><br /><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);font-size:85%;" ><span style="font-weight: bold;">This one really grinds my gears! Whatever Mugabe is, is a direct result of AmeriKKKan and European actions that have driven this country to where it is now. They decided when they declared independence and drove out the white farmers that they would take it back, no matter what the cost. </span> </span><span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"><span style="font-size:85%;">Well, that cost has been many, many lives in Zimbabwe. And the suffering has just begun</span>.</span><br /></div> <div style="font-family: arial;" face="arial"><strong><u><br /></u></strong><br /><strong><u><br /></u></strong><span style="font-weight: bold;font-size:100%;" ><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article4178960.ece">Israel flexes muscles with 'Iran attack' drill</a></span><br /><span style="font-size:85%;">Israeli aircraft have conducted a long-range mission designed to prepare for a possible strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities and to send a message to the world that it is ready to take military action if diplomacy fails to halt Tehran’s atomic programme.<br /><a rel="nofollow" style="font-weight: bold;" target="_blank" href="http://windowintopalestine.blogspot.com/2008/06/hamas-israel-violated-ceasefire-three.html">Hamas: "Israel violated ceasefire three times today"</a></span><br /><br /><br /><br /><span style="font-size:100%;"><a href="http://english.aljazeera.net/news/americas/2008/06/20086200105188321.html"><strong>Chavez threatens Europe oil ban</strong></a></span><br /><span style="font-size:85%;">Hugo Chavez, the Venezuelan president, has threatened to stop selling oil to European countries if they implement tough new legislation against illegal immigrants.<span class="DetaildSuammary" id="Htmlphcontrol1"> <p>The move follows the EU parliament's new guidelines in which illegal migrants can be held in detention centres for up to 18 months before being expelled.</p> </span></span><br /><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;font-size:100%;" ><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0620/p07s04-wome.html">How Iran would retaliate if it comes to war</a><br /></span><span style="font-size:85%;">With an active military manpower of 540,</span> <span style="font-size:85%;">000 – the largest in the Middle East – dependent on some of the lowest per capita defense spending in the region. Iran "can deal fatal blows to aggressor America by unpredictable and creative tactical moves," the senior commander Brig. Gen. Gholam Ali Rashid said in late May. "It is meaningless to back down before an enemy who has targeted the roots of our existence."<br /><br /></span> <p><span style="font-size:85%;">Iran's supreme religious leader Ayatollah Sayyed Ali Khamenei also warned of far-reaching revenge in 2006. "The Americans should know that if they assault Iran, their interests will be harmed anywhere in the world that is possible," he said. "The Iranian nation will respond to any blow with double the intensity." </span></p><strong><u><br /><br /><br /></u></strong></div> <div style="font-family:arial;"><strong><u>IRAQ:<br /><br /><br /><br /></u></strong><span style="font-weight: bold;font-size:100%;" ><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/oil-giants-return-to-iraq-851036.html">Oil giants return to Iraq</a></span><br /><span style="font-size:85%;">The deals are for repair and technical support in some of the co</span> <span style="font-size:85%;">untry's largest oilfields, the Oil Ministry in Baghdad said yesterday. The return of "Big Oil" will add to the suspicions of those in the Middle East who claimed that the overthrow of Saddam was secretly driven by the West's desire to gain control of Iraq's oil. It will also be greeted with dismay by many Iraqis who fear losing control of their vast oil reserves.</span><br /><strong><u><br /><br /><br /></u></strong></div> <div face="arial"><strong><u>ECONOMY:<br /><br /><br /><br /></u></strong><span style="font-weight: bold;font-size:100%;" ><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2008/06/16/bcnecb116.xml&CMP=ILC-mostviewedbox">Morgan Stanley warns of 'catastrophic event' as ECB fights Federal Reserve</a></span><br /><span style="font-size:85%;">"We see striking similarities between the transatlantic tensions that built up in the early 1990s and those that are accumulating again today. The outcome of the 1992 deadlock was a major currency crisis and a recession in Europe," said a report by Morgan Stanley's European experts.</span><br /><strong><u><br /></u></strong><br /><strong><u><br /></u></strong></div> <div face="arial"><strong><u>OP-ED:<br /><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;font-size:100%;" ><br /></span></u></strong><span style="font-weight: bold;font-size:100%;" ><a href="http://www.counterpunch.org/valentine06132008.html">McCain: War Hero or Go-To Collaborator?</a></span><br /><span style="font-size:85%;">This is the lesson of McCain’s experience as a POW: a true politician, a hollow man, his only allegiance is to power. The Vietnamese, like McCain’s campaign contributors today, protected and promoted him and in return, he danced to their tune.</span><br /><br /><br /><span style="font-size:100%;"><br /><a href="http://thedailyvoice.com/voice/2008/06/the-wrong-side-of-history-000753.php" id="s-QuWdSP3rX7hZ8BSsNCmxRg:u-AFQjCNGSW_6gMIUsR3cWYAuj6JRQJRUArg:r-0_1223097452"><b>The wrong side of history</b></a></span><br /><span style="font-size:85%;">Since that memorable evening, my thoughts turned to the Blacks in leadership who were on the other side of history the night Obama became the presidential nominee. I wondered ab </span><span style="font-size:85%;">out people like billionaire Robert Johnson, who personally attacked Obama for "doing something in the neighborhood" that he would not say while Hillary and Bill Clinton were on the front lines for black people.</span><br /><br /><strong><u><br /><br /></u></strong><span style="font-weight: bold;font-size:100%;" ><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.israelenews.com/view.asp?ID=2216">Will the Mossad Assassinate Obama?</a><br /></span><span style="font-size:85%;">Established governments almost never in the past used assassination as a tool until the rise of mind-control assassination techniques. Even then, assassination appeared to be largely a tool by rogue elements of the CIA to eliminate political undesirables within the US. Only the Israelis appear inclined to assassinate foreign politicians since they are immune from criticism in the Western press, and the MOSSAD has been largely successful at blaming certain terrorist events and assassinations on the Muslims.<br /></span><strong><u><br /><br /><br /></u></strong><span style="font-weight: bold;font-size:100%;" ><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/15384">The Poverty of Reaganism-Bushism</a></span><br /><span style="font-size:85%;">Because your education in self-destructive political foolishness is not yet complete, it remains necessary to pretend that this is a real ideology with real economic principles that are actually adhered to. You know, stuff like 'market discipline' and the 'invisible hand', which only ever seem to apply to the already vulnerable, not to the friendly rich people forever espousing these ideas. In truth, there actually are a set of operating principles here. Just not the ones that are advertised.</span><br /><strong><u><br /><br /><br /></u></strong></div> <div face="arial"><strong><u>SCIENCE&TECHNOLOGY:<br /><br /><br /><br /></u></strong><span style="font-weight: bold;font-size:100%;" ><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://techinsider.nextgov.com/2008/06/the_next_big_data_breach.php">The Next Big Data Breach</a></span><span style="font-size:85%;"><span id="content_text"><p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">I</span>t’s not that hard to fake a fingerprint," Swire told the panel. "Google it and you can find a way to fake one for less than 10 bucks."</p> <p>It's true. A Google search for "fake fingerprint" returns a whole page on how to fake a fingerprint -- even a You Tube video. And most don't even charge for the information. </p></span></span><br /><strong><u><br /></u></strong></div><span style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;font-family:arial;" >FOOD&DRINK:</span> <div style="font-family: arial;"><strong><u><br /><br /><br /></u></strong><span style="font-size:100%;"><a href="http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article20139.htm"><strong>Why Are Those Wacky Koreans Dissin' Our Beef? </strong></a></span><br /><span style="font-size:85%;">You wouldn't know it from reading the newspapers, but the streets of Seoul are packed with tens of thousands of angry protestors who've brought business and government to a standstill. The demonstrations have dragged on for more than a month and show no sign of ending anytime soon. President Lee Myung-Bak's decision to lift the ban on US beef imports has set off a political firestorm that is likely to bring down the government and put the kibosh on free trade agreements for years to come</span><br /> <strong><u><br /><br /><br /></u></strong></div> <div style="font-family: arial;"><strong><u>REVIEWS/INTERVIEWS:</u></strong><strong><u><br /></u></strong><h2><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiGhqWalv5T3fQhLRZbmwVfKpZPZEE4Y8m3XPaWGUDTy_AlXH0OUNiG1ddJ4r9NCog6knvlOb59NXhv1BqyAe3OBHw-OZn7RbupU9yRKJiLBmCjcpKyGpQxDANBoskzlA5dkCQ2Kw/s1600-h/Verdery.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiGhqWalv5T3fQhLRZbmwVfKpZPZEE4Y8m3XPaWGUDTy_AlXH0OUNiG1ddJ4r9NCog6knvlOb59NXhv1BqyAe3OBHw-OZn7RbupU9yRKJiLBmCjcpKyGpQxDANBoskzlA5dkCQ2Kw/s200/Verdery.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5214170943264295106" border="0" /></a></h2><br /><strong><u><br /></u></strong><br /><span style="font-size:100%;"><a style="font-weight: bold;" class="single_block_1_items" href="http://blackstarnews.com/?c=127&a=4625">The Lovely Trini-Born Verdery</a></span><br /><br /><br /><strong><u><br /><br /><br /><br /></u></strong></div> <div style="font-family: arial;"><strong><u><br /><span style="font-family:arial;">HUMOR?:</span><br /><br /><br /></u></strong> <h3 class="post-title entry-title"><a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/uclickcomics/20080620/cx_bo_uc/bo20080620"><center><img src="http://d.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/uc/20080620/sbo080620.gif" width="525" border="0" height="168" /></center></a></h3><br /><strong><u><br /><br /><br /></u></strong></div> <div style="font-family: arial;"><strong></strong> </div> <div style="font-family: arial;"><strong></strong> </div> <div style="font-family: arial;"><strong></strong> </div> <div><u><br /></u></div> <div><strong></strong> </div> <div><strong></strong> </div> <div><strong></strong> </div> <div><strong></strong> </div> <div><strong></strong> </div> <div><strong></strong> </div> <div><strong></strong><br /></div>Gregory Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02174480604474920143noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20956749.post-77339056503198053462008-06-19T21:54:00.001-04:002008-06-19T21:57:29.571-04:00Benazir Bhutto<span style="font-family: arial;">After the BBC censored this clip and then reinstated it, then some of them now claiming they NEVER censored it, the mystery DEEPENS. With Benazir Bhutto assassinated the motive arises in that she quite clearly leads not only her death to the door of the Pakistanis but also responsibility for the 9/11 attacks are implicated as well. Aired on 2nd November 2007,David Frost the presenter did not challenge her on her assertion (2:14) that Bin Laden was murdered, so maybe he was and the West has not announced it.<br /><br />It would make sense that the West would cover up such a truth, as Bin Laden is needed as a "bogeyman" to continue the farcical "War on Terror" </span><br /><br /><br /><br /><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/UnychOXj9Tg&hl=en"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/UnychOXj9Tg&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>Gregory Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02174480604474920143noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20956749.post-46671014955263808062008-06-19T18:26:00.001-04:002008-06-19T18:28:51.906-04:00Lighten Up G...A Little Music for Ya!<span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(204, 51, 204);font-size:180%;" ><span style="font-family: arial;">Monk</span></span><br /><br /><br /><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ixahuLVBNM4&hl=en"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ixahuLVBNM4&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>Gregory Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02174480604474920143noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20956749.post-36882452069892592522008-06-19T17:48:00.000-04:002008-06-19T17:51:08.459-04:00I'm Voting Republican<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/FiQJ9Xp0xxU&hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/FiQJ9Xp0xxU&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>Gregory Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02174480604474920143noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20956749.post-38552861973636980532008-06-17T16:26:00.000-04:002008-06-17T16:27:09.443-04:00A REAL CLASS ACT<object height="344" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ntz7SWm-xWo&hl=en"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ntz7SWm-xWo&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" height="344" width="425"></embed></object>Gregory Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02174480604474920143noreply@blogger.com0